Critiques of racist inflection by Knitta Please, the Houston-launched project, are generating many important discussions worth updating you on.
Alexis L. has posted a roundup of anti-racist actions and resources related to Knitta Please, including speaking out against the collective’s racial characterizations.
With Knitta Please participants continuing to turn a nice buck off of Black caricaturing, it is vital to raise awareness.
Alexis’ latest writing (and the citation of this blog’s reference to co-opting graf culture — thanks!) has me thinking a lot about soft cultural imperialism among non-Black middle/upper-class youth. In this case, the cultural imperialism isn’t what one traditionally thinks of the phrase, but rather the picking apart of minority cultures and subcultures by majorities to do with and represent as they please.
It was hard for me to read the Etsy article on Knitta Please without my stomach churning a bit. It included such gems as:
Like spray graffiti, knit graffiti seems to be infectious. During her visit to the Etsy Labs, Magda [Magdalena Sayeg] told me a bit about the worldwide appeal… Her next project is writing a book about how to start your own crew. Imagine different artists developing their own take on the emerging public art form… a Westcoast/Eastcoast rivalry, distinctive tags from famous virtuosos emerging from the underground.
As someone whose life and family were profoundly impacted by the violence engendered by rivalries “crews” are associated with and deprivation romanticized in “the underground,” stuff like this makes you wonder if there’s a White Picket Planet from which particular people hail, but that I have no knowledge about. To put it bluntly, a coastal or neighborhood rivalry sounds like great fodder for art blogs until you understand how such clashes escalate and someone (like a cousin of mine, for instance) gets stabbed a dozen times by a ‘rival’ from a competing ‘crew.’ Virtuoso such experiences are not for the communities that see such regularly.
The world is full of subcultures creating their own insular language. Punks, white supremacists and fraternity members are examples of these groups which have terminology for themselves. In rare cases is there such a bald cribbing by non-Blacks of imagery, for a group that is as, Morgan reminds us, strikingly un-diverse racially, or blindingly white if we’re being honest. In this case, it’s “knittas” as non-Blacks appropriating a racial slur, “yarnbombing” as fodder for entertainment among the haves, and hip-hop culture as a minstrel show.
On another level, these sorts of projects are presented as alternatives to whatever is presupposed to be anti-social behavior, in this case graffiti, a valid artform that does not require an alternative. Criminalization of placement of graffiti is a symptom of larger social issues such as restrictions of the arts, racial profiling, defunding of arts in schools, lack of education that prepares youth of color for the future and more. The narrative Knitta Please operates in is one in which these alternative projects are presented as replacements to graffiti and graf culture, not as challenges to the issues of criminalization of graf writers. Thus, implicitly, Knitta Please and its friends can dream of a world where there are knitting crews, knitting rivalries et al. — essentially a non-Black version of a Black and oppressed people’s culture that then presumably either goes away or is criminalized out of existence — while people of color are left to contend with the impact of majority-leaning criminal justice on youth.
As you check out commenters, a common refrain to critiques like what Alexis has raised are ‘political correctness’ and ‘free speech.’ Both claims deserve discussion.
‘Free speech’ and ‘political correctness’ are sadly often used as a bludgeon to silence criticism. That such claims are going on in the context of a purportedly progressive art community, and allowed to fly without comment from Knitta Please’s participants, raises questions of intent and agency.
History is filled with instances of fundamental human rights being denied to people of color, but afforded to majorities. Seldom are those who howl ‘political correctness’ loudest ever the ones to step out when such abuses are happening. Just as insidious is the unspoken message that those with concerns should simply hold their tongues, intimidated out of saying something may be racist for fear of being isolated as infringing on ‘free speech.’
Feminist thinker Jo Freeman wrote most eloquently about avoidance of accountability in her piece, “The Tyranny of Structurelessness.” In her essay, structurelessness is seen as a way of masking power and is most avidly advocated by those who are the most powerful. In this lens, dispersing accountability by lobbing claims of control is intended mainly to break such accountability. Unfortunately, in the absence of accountability, the connected, the cunning and the dominant rule.
Finally, some have made a point of Knitta Please being predominantly white, but having participants of Latin or South American extraction. As someone of Mexican descent, I’ll be the first to say Latin and South American countries have issues with race as well; being from South America doesn’t mean a person is not white or doesn’t occupy such a place in those societies, or this one. My intent isn’t to get personal, certainly, but this dialogue must crucially understand that Latinidad or “of color” personhood cannot and should not be used as a wedge against Blackness. The principle of representation and the problem of appropriation here are still important and clear.
7 Responses to Knitta Please, Racism & the Backlash
Alexis L. of One Grand Home
December 17th, 2009 at 7:40 am
Ernesto,
Thank you for your very important, in-depth and nuanced expansion on the co-opting of graf culture by Knitta and all that it entails. I was really hoping you might expound on this point for those of us (me!) who really are not familiar with the subculture. I’m still digesting much of what you have written but your post finally answers for me the underlying question, ‘What does knitting have to do with black ‘ghetto’ / street culture?’ and it appears to me that, in fact ‘Knitta, Please’ imagines itself as a corrective of sprayed graffitti culture. It’s a point that now seems rather obvious but one I had initially missed in, for instance, the Apartment Therapy article that said, ” Knitta Please! is devoted to creating and capturing images of knitted tagging… as apposed to spray-painted tagging. ” [sic].
As opposed to, yes.
It brings us back to that familiar, tiresome meme of black people (and other people of color, but mostly black people in the history of the US) as being originators of earthy, primitive or gritty ‘real’ culture and white elites as being the refiners of that culture. You know the refrain: Chuck Berry invented rock and roll but Elvis Presley took it to ‘the next level’; the Beatles took it to ‘the next level’; Eminem took it to…I’ll stop.
So with that opposition in mind, what does the name ‘Knitta, Please’ mean, or at least, suggest? It now seriously suggests to me a derisive putting-in-place of traditional graf writers and graf culture using racist language as in ‘You deface buildings with your graffiti. Knitta, please / N-gga, please. We knit and beautify the environment.’ Yes, they take it to the next level, retaining all of the language about crews and rivalries but without any of the bloodshed or defacement! For instance, how do you protect your turf in a Knitta-on-Knitta rivalry? With a simple MySpace post (http://blogs.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog.ListAll&friendId=34941089):
Dearest Friends o’ Knitta – Many, many of you have professed the desire to start bombing your respective hoods with your own knitted tags, inspired by Knitta! We love it. We love and appreciate all of the enthusiasm and support pouring in from all over the globe. This is really exciting and keeps us smilin’! Well, my fellow knitta’s and I have sat and discussed the possibility of Knitta factions in other cities, while still being able to maintain a distinct point of origin here in H-Town and specific Knitta-isms that we hold dear. Here’s what we’ve decided: There’s no monopoly on knitting or graffiti. Anyone, anywhere, can do these things. We’ve only elevated a new trend of combining those two activities and given ourselves street names. This is definitely open to the public. We’d love to see other people tagging with knitted items! We think that’d be great! Here’s the sticky part though… We’d like for you to tag under your own unique crew name and individual tags. We’d rather reserve the name “Knitta” and the phrase “Knitta, Please” for ourselves. That’s our crew and our motto. Just like graffiti crews everywhere, they all paint, but they all have different names. I think it would be amazing to see different “crews” popping up all over the world, installing little knitted hugs across their cities. Now, when you get “discovered” and start getting press, it’d be great if you threw a wink and a nod in our direction for the inspiration. I think that’s fair. We’ll nod right back, in the form of posting tag photos and letters you send to us on our website (as soon as we actually go live!). We can even have a list of crew names and locations, complete with photos, on a page – just like graffiti sites. I hope you understand about the name issue. We think that’s the best way possible for this to take off globally (as it should!) and maintain our roots. Cool? Cool. Now get to knittin’! L, AKrylik (Knitta Crew)
“Just like graffitti sites”! But “elevated! To the next level, ya know? Now stay in your respective lanes, knittas and of course, n-ggas. The thought that Knitta, Please isn’t just a failed pun but an actual, intentional and specific response to graffiti writers with racist language is not a conclusion I’ve arrived at quickly, happily or lightly but in absence of any other evidence, it’s what makes most sense to me. The logo is not just a whitewashing of a Black Power symbol; it’s the actual wielding of a fist against a group of … vandals? miscreants? grittsters who have originated but not elevated? Rhetorically, of course. If I seem far off, please let me know. And I will continue to think about what you have written.
Best,
Alexis
Ernesto Aguilar
December 17th, 2009 at 9:03 am
Alexis,
I want to thank you for your courage in bringing this matter up before a larger audience. I am in Houston, where this group started, and have met several of these folks, pre-Knitta. When I first heard the name (I’d lost touch with the people), I thought, ‘ick, offensive,’ but feel so used to seeing such stuff that I am sure I just moved on. Your post motivated me to put some thoughts out on issues that are extremely relevant. Thank you for that.
Your comment got me thinking about power.
Where it is intentional or not, Knitta Please offers people who do not have access to Black youth culture because of the limits placed on our collective experience by white supremacy and privilege a haven to experience it safely. What I mean by that — and please forgive the gross simplification, as no offense is intended — is though non-Black majorities have financial and historical power to control, purchase and shape Black youth culture (witness the many critiques of hip-hop turning negative as labels realized they can profit from selling harrowing urban rhymes to suburban non-Black youth), in the vast majority of cases the non-Black consumer can never actually be ‘down’ because of class/race constructs that a.) mean they will not be accepted, and b.) adopting longterm characteristics dominant society considers ‘Black’ makes one a target for criminalization, and few non-Blacks are willing to take it that far.
Cute hip-hop name? Funny. “Tagging” with knitted blankets on poles? Pretty. Unconsciously (and consciously, as you point out) is the desire to displace graffiti culture (unfunny and ‘ugly’). Why “vandalize” that building with spraypaint, the message is, when you can knit a multicolored pattern? That everyone can bicker about the legality of graf culture alone demonstrates the power of white power and privilege in shaping our notions of beauty, landed capital (and how that land was ultimately acquired), order and law.
What you offered from myspace is an interesting development, as it is more than just claiming a “crew” name, but a move to protect the brand. Magdalena and presumably others with the Houston group are marketing products themselves, and others will seek to make money off the name (e.g. a book). Dozens of people using the same name dilutes the brand and profit potential. Undercutting attempts to market aesthetics is one reason groups like CrimeThinc (a political collective which supports broad activism under its name) are built as networks instead of as singular groups looking to lock down a brand.
I am skeptical Knitta Please participants are ignorant of these matters. Actually, I am certain they’re not.
I really do think you raise some absolutely valid critiques. Thank you for bringing this conversation up in the first place.
e.
Nick Alvarado
December 17th, 2009 at 9:18 am
I always see these these thoughtful criticisms with rolling eyes when they include ‘assomeonewhohas…’ and try to chump people who they believe undermines, usurps, plaigerizes, profits, exploits, or competes with that which is authentic. Ballderdash. A bunch of frumpy 20somethings take a phrase, make it into a tag line, post pictures of their simple knit jobs, that mimic the ‘authentic’ language of modern graffiti culture. The Romans gave us the word that describes using public and private space to send unauthorize messages, so let’s not try and lock down authenticity. A few texans trying to apply a theme to their knitta meme does not a knitting needle stabbing make. It also doesn’t mean they are intentionally or accidentally shake a fist at black-anything. That’s a big-time leap and one that really doesn’t make sense except to people striving to learn how to defend a thesis at a review committee.
Ernesto Aguilar
December 17th, 2009 at 1:35 pm
Nick,
Though you know I know and love you (and will be a lot more forthright than I would with commenters I do not know), attempting to divert a conversation into the language being used, rather than taking time to write an actual defense of the ‘frumpy 20-somethings’ you reference or addressing the concerns, is condescending, lazy and thoroughly common.
I write on these issues for a lot of reasons. Asserting authenticity is not one of them, and I think you know that.
Nick Alvarado
December 19th, 2009 at 12:30 am
Ernesto,
I don’t want to come off as a comment troll, but it looks like I have. I understand the power of words, and their judicious use. I think I can’t stand Alexis L. stance. She does a lot of work to defend it, and quotes her sources, so I can see the learned style. I just don’t think she fathoms what I perceive to be the Knitta Please product. In Texas, just because you wear boots doesn’t make you a cowboy. Tagging street lamps with yarn doesn’t really make you a crew, but we’d assume that people understood that by the very maternal material involved. http://www.banksy.co.uk/indoors/grannies.html
Due to my laziness and desire not to get into a debate on the semiotics of street sewing, I won’t bother you with why the why, but I’ll just lay out the what, since I think you already know something about the knitta crew and about graffiti. What is the Knitta Please product? A business woman, who comes up with an idea to put unwanted yarn on hard surfaces instead of flesh or canvas. She decides the contrast is significant, supported by people’s feedback. She wants to expose it to more people. She expands the idea. She gives it a witty knitty name, she gathers fans and supporters, she franchises. loses control of the message, but uses her business sense and knitta name association to get paid to discuss and install yarn around the world. She attempts to protect the brand so she can be the paid Banksy of knitters and continue to get funding for occasional trips to show her artful idea. How American is that? Very. As to the use of Knitta-imitative crew names, and whatup knitta? I think it has to do with the fact that you know who the artist is, unlike anonymous taggers, knowing she is white makes her a target of intellectuals who want to expose the meaning of yarn, and names, and profit motives and art. If she had remained anonymous, we’d all be left to wonder ‘what it all means’. Knitta Please are the unauthorized and franchised art installations for Seyeg. It capitalizes on the knitting fad that is spreading to throughout 20 something women. KP is Contrasting the knitty from the gritty, the urban from the urbane, furthering her artistic and commercial enterprises. The fact that she takes language of the streets and uses it for her own commercial and artistic purposes…sounds like pop art immemorial to me. Perhaps she should change her tag to Knitti-gritti and avoid the intellectual animus altogether.
Ernesto Aguilar
December 19th, 2009 at 12:34 am
Now that’s the Nick I know!
Very thoughtful and provocative. Alexis may want to ping back some thoughts on your responses to her remarks.
jafabrit
December 21st, 2009 at 3:49 pm
I enjoyed reading your post and the comments, a lot of thoughts and ideas to process and ponder. I was confused at first about the reasons for people being upset, but I wasn’t born and raised in this culture and wasn’t familiar with the connotations. After reading up on it and hearing other opinions, discussions I am not surprised people are upset about it.
I do yarnbombing because it is fun and as a artist I enjoyed the challenge of putting knitting into a different context as well as the place in which it is attached.
I don’t regard myself as a graffiti artist ( although I have done a wee bit in my younger days), a knitter (my passion is mixed media arts, painting, embroidery)or someone who is making a feminist statement, nor am I a bored old granny, nor do I feel it replaces traditional graffiti forms (which I LOVE, just took a load of pics of some in puerto rico). My friend and I started doing it after we had put together a street themed art event for the Yellow Springs Arts council. The town really LOVED what we were doing and encouraged us. It has nothing to do with any desire to have it replace other street art, it’s just something that gives our community joy and a bit whimsy in between my more serious work.
regards Corrine